Global BRTData

    ABOUT
  BRT
DATA

About Global BRTData

The BRTData gathers information on bus priority systems in cities around the world. The platform is source of research for academics, journalists, students and municipal technicians, as well as provides technical background for decision making regarding public transport.

The data presented contemplate BRT systems (Bus Rapid Transit - median-aligned and segregated bus lanes, pre-board fare collection, and platform-level boarding) and bus priority systems: cities with dedicated bus lanes, but without some of the elements of a BRT. The website allows the user to know the systems and corridors of each city, compare indicators and generate graphs.

The BRTData was developed by BRT+ CoE, a Center of Excellence in BRT, and by WRI, with collaboration of the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP). The platform is monthly updated with reliable data and verified by WRI Brasil Ross Center for Sustainable Cities.

    FIND
  YOUR
SYSTEM

BY REGION

BY COUNTRY

BY CITY

    FIND
  YOUR
INDICATOR

SYSTEM

CORRIDOR

Annual fare revenue (US$ millions)

An estimate of the total amount of farebox revenue collected each year calculated based on the average user fare and annual passenger trips. Data in current US dollars.

Region Country City Value Year Source
Latin America Argentina Buenos Aires
Latin America Argentina Buenos Aires - Metropolitan Area
Latin America Argentina Córdoba 3.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Argentina Neuquén 3.3 2021 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Argentina Santa Fe 4.2 2021 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Belém 15.5 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Belo Horizonte 43.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Brasília 7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Campinas 59 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Criciúma 1.8 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Curitiba 154.2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Fortaleza 28.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Goiânia 55.2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Guarulhos 5.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Juiz de Fora
Latin America Brazil Londrina 7.9 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Maringá 5.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Natal
Latin America Brazil Niterói 81.9 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Porto Alegre 100.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Recife 65.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Rio de Janeiro 556.8 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil São Paulo 16.2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil São Paulo - Metropolitan area 55.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Sorocaba 5.5 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Sumaré 27.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Teresina 5.9 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Uberaba 2.4 2016 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Uberlândia 5.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Brazil Salvador
Latin America Chile Concepción 20 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Chile Santiago 70.9 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Colombia Barranquilla 14.2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Colombia Bogotá 294.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Colombia Bucaramanga 9.8 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Colombia Cali 55.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Colombia Cartagena 5.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Colombia Medellín 7.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Colombia Pereira 14.2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Ecuador Guayaquil 16.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Ecuador Quito 39.1 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America El Salvador Gran San Salvador 2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Guatemala Guatemala 5.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Mexico Acapulco 10.5 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Mexico Chihuahua 3.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Mexico Guadalajara 9.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Mexico Guadalupe
Latin America Mexico Juárez 4.5 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Mexico León de los Aldama 25 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Mexico Mexico City 78.1 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Mexico Mexico City - Metropolitan Area 34 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Mexico Monterrey
Latin America Mexico Pachuca 9.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Mexico Puebla 19.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Mexico Tijuana 1 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Panama Panama
Latin America Peru Lima 68.2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Trinidad and Tobago Port of Spain - Arima
Latin America Uruguay Montevideo 4.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Venezuela Barquisimeto 0.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Venezuela Caracas 0.2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Latin America Venezuela Merida 0.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Oceania Australia Adelaide 24 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Oceania Australia Brisbane 317.5 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Oceania Australia Sydney - Metropolitan Area 18.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Oceania New Caledonia Nouméa
Oceania New Zealand Auckland 16 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe Belgium Liège
Europe Finland Helsinki 24.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Belfort 8.1 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Caen 18.1 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Cannes
Europe France Châlon-sur-Saône 1.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Douai 0.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Evry
Europe France La Rochelle 1.8 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Le Mans 1.9 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Lille
Europe France Lorient 16.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Lyon 2.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Maubeuge 1.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Metz 9.5 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Nancy 14 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Nantes 12.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Nîmes 2.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Paris 45.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Rouen 17 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Saint-Nazaire 3.5 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Strasbourg 4.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Toulouse 5.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe France Bayonne - Biarritz
Europe France Bayonne - Tarnos
Europe Germany Essen 6.9 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe Germany Oberhausen
Europe Netherlands Almere
Europe Netherlands Amsterdam 29.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe Netherlands Eindhoven 9.9 2007 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide (ITDP) 2007
Europe Netherlands Enschede 0.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe Netherlands Utrecht 27.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe Spain Castellón 0.8 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe Spain Granada 8.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe Sweden Gothenburg 17.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe Sweden Jonkoping 13.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe Sweden Stockholm 51 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe Switzerland Zurich 8.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe Turkey Istanbul 56.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe United Kingdom Cambridge 9.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe United Kingdom Fareham - Gosport
Europe United Kingdom Greater Manchester 29.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe United Kingdom Kent 3.8 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe United Kingdom Luton
Europe United Kingdom Runcorn 13.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Europe United Kingdom Swansea
Northern America Canada Calgary
Northern America Canada Gatineau
Northern America Canada Mississauga
Northern America Canada Ottawa 137.2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Northern America Canada Quebec 157.6 www.rtcquebec.ca
Northern America Canada Winnipeg 83.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Northern America Canada York Regional Municipality 8 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Northern America United States Albuquerque
Northern America United States Alexandria - Arlington 0.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Northern America United States Cleveland 7.1 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Northern America United States Eugene 3.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Northern America United States Fort Collins 0.8 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Northern America United States Hartford County 3.2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Northern America United States Las Vegas 43.1 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Northern America United States Los Angeles 13.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Northern America United States Miami 10.9 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Northern America United States New York 176.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Northern America United States Orlando 0 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Northern America United States Pittsburgh 29.5 2007 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide (ITDP) 2007
Northern America United States San Bernardino
Northern America United States San Francisco
Northern America United States Richmond
Asia China Beijing 19.9 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Changde
Asia China Changzhou 11 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Chengdu
Asia China Chongqing 0.4 2011 www.chinabrt.org
Asia China Dalian 2.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Guangzhou 55.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Hangzhou 33.9 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Hefei 4.2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Jinan 14.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Kunming 10.8 2007 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide (ITDP) 2007 ; www.chinabrt.org
Asia China Lanzhou 9.1 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Lianyungang 1.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Urumqi 12 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Xiamen 55 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Yancheng 1 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Yichang 15.1 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Yinchuan 2.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Zaozhuang 2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia China Zhengzhou 20.5 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia India Ahmedabad 9.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia India Amritsar
Asia India Bhopal 6.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia India Hubballi-Dharwad
Asia India Indore 1.9 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia India Jaipur 0.2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia India Pune - Primpi-Chinchwad
Asia India Rajkot
Asia India Surat 0.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia Indonesia Jakarta 2.3 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia Iran Isfahan
Asia Iran Tabriz
Asia Iran Tehran 21 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia Israel Haifa 38.9 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia Japan Kesennuma - Tome
Asia Japan Nagoya 3.5 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia Malaysia Subang Jaya
Asia Pakistan Islamabad - Rawalpindi 3.4 2015 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia Pakistan Lahore 4.9 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia Republic of Korea Seoul 94.1 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia Taiwan Chiayi 0.6 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia Taiwan Taichung 14.7 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia Taiwan Taipei 197.1 2007 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide (ITDP) 2007
Asia Thailand Bangkok 2 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Asia Vietnam Hanoi
Africa Nigeria Lagos 47.5 2010 Viva 2010 ( www.uncrd.or.jp ); Trans-Africa Consortium 2010 ; www.itdp.org
Africa South Africa Cape Town 24.8 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Africa South Africa Johannesburg 7.4 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Africa South Africa Pretoria 0.5 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Africa Tanzania Dar es Salaam 10.6 2016 Calculated using annual demand and fare
Africa Kenya Nairobi