Latin America |
Argentina |
Córdoba |
3.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Argentina |
Buenos Aires |
|
|
|
Latin America |
Argentina |
Buenos Aires - Metropolitan Area |
|
|
|
Latin America |
Argentina |
Neuquén |
3.3 |
2021 |
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Argentina |
Santa Fe |
4.2 |
2021 |
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Sumaré |
27.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Brasília |
7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Goiânia |
55.2 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Juiz de Fora |
|
|
|
Latin America |
Brazil |
Londrina |
7.9 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Natal |
|
|
|
Latin America |
Brazil |
Niterói |
81.9 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Rio de Janeiro |
556.8 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Sorocaba |
5.5 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Teresina |
5.9 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Salvador |
|
|
|
Latin America |
Brazil |
Belo Horizonte |
43.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Porto Alegre |
100.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
São Paulo |
1660.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
São Paulo - Metropolitan area |
55.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Uberaba |
2.4 |
2016 |
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Uberlândia |
5.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Belém |
15.5 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Criciúma |
1.8 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Curitiba |
154.2 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Fortaleza |
28.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Guarulhos |
15.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Maringá |
5.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Recife |
65.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Campinas |
59 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
São José dos Campos |
5.48 |
2023 |
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Brazil |
Feira de Santana |
321 |
2022 |
SMTT |
Latin America |
Chile |
Concepción |
20 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Chile |
Santiago |
70.9 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Colombia |
Barranquilla |
14.2 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Colombia |
Bogotá |
294.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Colombia |
Bucaramanga |
9.8 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Colombia |
Cali |
55.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Colombia |
Cartagena |
5.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Colombia |
Medellín |
7.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Colombia |
Pereira |
14.2 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Ecuador |
Quito |
39.1 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Ecuador |
Guayaquil |
16.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
El Salvador |
Gran San Salvador |
2 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Guatemala |
Guatemala |
5.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Mexico |
Mexico City - Metropolitan Area |
34 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Mexico |
Puebla |
19.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Mexico |
Chihuahua |
3.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Mexico |
Monterrey |
|
|
|
Latin America |
Mexico |
Pachuca |
9.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Mexico |
Acapulco |
10.5 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Mexico |
Guadalajara |
9.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Mexico |
Juárez |
4.5 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Mexico |
León de los Aldama |
25 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Mexico |
Mexico City |
78.1 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Mexico |
Tijuana |
1 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Mexico |
Guadalupe |
|
|
|
Latin America |
Panama |
Panama |
|
|
|
Latin America |
Peru |
Lima |
68.2 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Trinidad and Tobago |
Port of Spain - Arima |
|
|
|
Latin America |
Uruguay |
Montevideo |
4.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Venezuela |
Barquisimeto |
0.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Venezuela |
Caracas |
0.2 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Latin America |
Venezuela |
Merida |
0.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Oceania |
Australia |
Brisbane |
317.5 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Oceania |
Australia |
Adelaide |
24 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Oceania |
Australia |
Sydney - Metropolitan Area |
18.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Oceania |
New Caledonia |
Nouméa |
|
|
|
Oceania |
New Zealand |
Auckland |
16 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
Belgium |
Liège |
|
|
|
Europe |
Finland |
Helsinki |
24.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Belfort |
8.1 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Cannes |
|
|
|
Europe |
France |
Chalon-sur-Saône |
1.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Douai |
0.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
La Rochelle |
1.8 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Maubeuge |
1.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Rouen |
17 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Caen |
18.1 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Evry |
|
|
|
Europe |
France |
Le Mans |
1.9 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Lille |
|
|
|
Europe |
France |
Lorient |
16.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Saint-Nazaire |
3.5 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Toulouse |
5.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Strasbourg |
4.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Nîmes |
2.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Metz |
9.5 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Lyon |
2.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Nantes |
34.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Nancy |
14 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Paris |
45.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
France |
Bayonne - Biarritz |
|
|
|
Europe |
France |
Bayonne - Tarnos |
|
|
|
Europe |
Germany |
Essen |
6.9 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
Germany |
Oberhausen |
|
|
|
Europe |
Netherlands |
Enschede |
0.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
Netherlands |
Amsterdam |
29.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
Netherlands |
Utrecht |
27.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
Netherlands |
Almere |
|
|
|
Europe |
Netherlands |
Eindhoven |
9.9 |
2007 |
Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide (ITDP) 2007 |
Europe |
Spain |
Granada |
8.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
Spain |
Castellón |
0.8 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
Sweden |
Stockholm |
51 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
Sweden |
Gothenburg |
17.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
Sweden |
Jonkoping |
13.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
Switzerland |
Zurich |
8.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
Turkey |
Istanbul |
56.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
United Kingdom |
Cambridge |
9.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
United Kingdom |
Runcorn |
13.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
United Kingdom |
Kent |
3.8 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
United Kingdom |
Greater Manchester |
29.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Europe |
United Kingdom |
Fareham - Gosport |
|
|
|
Europe |
United Kingdom |
Luton |
|
|
|
Europe |
United Kingdom |
Swansea |
|
|
|
Asia |
Iran |
Tehran |
21 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
Iran |
Isfahan |
|
|
|
Asia |
Iran |
Tabriz |
|
|
|
Asia |
Taiwan |
Taipei |
197.1 |
2007 |
Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide (ITDP) 2007 |
Asia |
Taiwan |
Taichung |
14.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
Taiwan |
Chiayi |
0.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Yinchuan |
2.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Changde |
|
|
|
Asia |
China |
Hefei |
4.2 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Lianyungang |
1.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Urumqi |
0 |
|
|
Asia |
China |
Dalian |
2.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Guangzhou |
55.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Jinan |
14.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Zaozhuang |
2 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Beijing |
19.9 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Changzhou |
11 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Chengdu |
|
|
|
Asia |
China |
Hangzhou |
33.9 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Lanzhou |
9.1 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Xiamen |
55 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Yancheng |
1 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Yichang |
15.1 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Zhengzhou |
20.5 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
China |
Chongqing |
0.4 |
2011 |
www.chinabrt.org |
Asia |
China |
Kunming |
10.8 |
2007 |
Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide (ITDP) 2007 and www.chinabrt.org |
Asia |
India |
Indore |
1.9 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
India |
Surat |
0.6 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
India |
Ahmedabad |
9.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
India |
Bhopal |
6.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
India |
Jaipur |
0.2 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
India |
Pune - Primpi-Chinchwad |
|
|
|
Asia |
India |
Hubballi-Dharwad |
|
|
|
Asia |
India |
Amritsar |
|
|
|
Asia |
India |
Rajkot |
|
|
|
Asia |
Indonesia |
Jakarta |
2.3 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
Israel |
Haifa |
38.9 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
Japan |
Nagoya |
3.5 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
Japan |
Kesennuma - Tome |
|
|
|
Asia |
Malaysia |
Subang Jaya |
|
|
|
Asia |
Pakistan |
Lahore |
4.9 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
Pakistan |
Islamabad - Rawalpindi |
3.4 |
2015 |
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
Republic of Korea |
Seoul |
94.1 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
Thailand |
Bangkok |
2 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Asia |
Vietnam |
Hanoi |
|
|
|
Northern America |
Canada |
Gatineau |
|
|
|
Northern America |
Canada |
Ottawa |
137.2 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Northern America |
Canada |
Mississauga |
|
|
|
Northern America |
Canada |
Quebec |
157.6 |
|
www.rtcquebec.ca |
Northern America |
Canada |
Calgary |
|
|
|
Northern America |
Canada |
York Regional Municipality |
8 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Northern America |
Canada |
Winnipeg |
83.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Northern America |
United States |
Cleveland |
7.1 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Northern America |
United States |
Eugene |
3.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Northern America |
United States |
Las Vegas |
43.1 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Northern America |
United States |
Miami |
10.9 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Northern America |
United States |
New York |
176.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Northern America |
United States |
San Bernardino |
|
|
|
Northern America |
United States |
Alexandria - Arlington |
0.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Northern America |
United States |
Fort Collins |
0.8 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Northern America |
United States |
Hartford County |
3.2 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Northern America |
United States |
Pittsburgh |
29.5 |
2007 |
Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide (ITDP) 2007 |
Northern America |
United States |
Richmond |
|
|
|
Northern America |
United States |
Albuquerque |
|
|
|
Northern America |
United States |
Orlando |
0 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Northern America |
United States |
Los Angeles |
13.7 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Northern America |
United States |
San Francisco |
|
|
|
Africa |
Kenya |
Nairobi |
|
|
|
Africa |
Nigeria |
Lagos |
47.5 |
2010 |
Viva 2010 - www.uncrd.or.jp and Trans-Africa Consortium 2010 and www.itdp.org |
Africa |
South Africa |
Johannesburg |
7.4 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Africa |
South Africa |
Cape Town |
24.8 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Africa |
South Africa |
Pretoria |
0.5 |
|
Calculated using annual demand and fare |
Africa |
Tanzania |
Dar es Salaam |
10.6 |
2016 |
Calculated using annual demand and fare |