Global BRTData

    ABOUT
  BRT
DATA

About Global BRTData

The BRTData gathers information on bus priority systems in cities around the world. The platform is source of research for academics, journalists, students and municipal technicians, as well as provides technical background for decision making regarding public transport.

The data presented contemplate BRT systems (Bus Rapid Transit - median-aligned and segregated bus lanes, pre-board fare collection, and platform-level boarding) and bus priority systems: cities with dedicated bus lanes, but without some of the elements of a BRT. The website allows the user to know the systems and corridors of each city, compare indicators and generate graphs.

The BRTData was developed by BRT+ CoE, a Center of Excellence in BRT, and by WRI, with collaboration of the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP). The platform is monthly updated with reliable data and verified by WRI Brasil Ross Center for Sustainable Cities.

    FIND
  YOUR
SYSTEM

BY REGION

BY COUNTRY

BY CITY

    FIND
  YOUR
INDICATOR

SYSTEM

CORRIDOR

Station spacing (m)

Average distance between stations in the system. Data in meters.

Region Country City Value Year Source
Latin America Argentina Córdoba 588.9 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Argentina Buenos Aires 350.3 2021 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Argentina Buenos Aires - Metropolitan Area 679.4 2019 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Argentina Neuquén 461.5 2021 www.argentina.gob.ar
Latin America Argentina Santa Fe 380 2021 www.argentina.gob.ar
Latin America Brazil Sumaré 1,090
Latin America Brazil Brasília 1,968 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Goiânia 648.6 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Juiz de Fora 387.5 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Londrina 308.3
Latin America Brazil Natal 437.5
Latin America Brazil Niterói 905.3 2019 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Rio de Janeiro 700 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Sorocaba 554.5 2020 Calculated using corridor length and stations
Latin America Brazil Teresina 595.5 2021 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Salvador
Latin America Brazil Belo Horizonte 479.3 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Porto Alegre 496.6 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil São Paulo 558.3 2023 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil São Paulo - Metropolitan area 625 2015 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Uberaba 486.7 2018 Calculated using corridor length and stations
Latin America Brazil Uberlândia 500 2014 www.uberlandia.mg.gov.br
Latin America Brazil Belém 857.2 2020 Calculated using corridor length and stations
Latin America Brazil Criciúma 500 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Curitiba 699.1 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Fortaleza 666.7 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Guarulhos 710 2022 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Maringá 345.5 2018 Calculated using corridor length and stations
Latin America Brazil Recife 1010.2 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Campinas 557.3
Latin America Brazil São José dos Campos 1538.5 2022 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Brazil Feira de Santana 585.91 2023 SMTT
Latin America Chile Concepción 329.3 Calculated using corridor length and stations
Latin America Chile Santiago 416.1
Latin America Colombia Barranquilla 933.3
Latin America Colombia Bogotá 812.2 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Colombia Bucaramanga 1,100 2018 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Colombia Cali 680.6 2016 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Colombia Cartagena 629.4 2016 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Colombia Medellín 640
Latin America Colombia Pereira 553.6 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Ecuador Quito 566.7
Latin America Ecuador Guayaquil 698.5
Latin America El Salvador Gran San Salvador 711.1 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Guatemala Guatemala 800 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Mexico Mexico City - Metropolitan Area 620 2016 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Mexico Puebla 489.4 2015 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Mexico Chihuahua 622.2 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Mexico Monterrey 771.8 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Mexico Pachuca 634.6 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Mexico Acapulco 1,000 2016 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Mexico Guadalajara 592.6
Latin America Mexico Juárez 757.6 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Mexico León de los Aldama 521.3
Latin America Mexico Mexico City 645.2 2018 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Mexico Tijuana 508.9 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Mexico Guadalupe 447.1 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Panama Panama 294.1 2015 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Peru Lima 684.2 2019 Calculated using corridor length and stations
Latin America Trinidad and Tobago Port of Spain - Arima
Latin America Uruguay Montevideo 370
Latin America Venezuela Barquisimeto 582.9 Calculated using system length and stations
Latin America Venezuela Caracas 470
Latin America Venezuela Merida 625
Oceania Australia Brisbane 1,153 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Oceania Australia Adelaide 5,000 2013 Currie G and Delbosc. A - Assessing bus rapid transit system performance in Australasia
Oceania Australia Sydney - Metropolitan Area 846.6 2013 Currie G and Delbosc. A - Assessing bus rapid transit system performance in Australasia
Oceania New Caledonia Nouméa 550 2019 www.neobus.nc
Oceania New Zealand Auckland 1,240 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe Belgium Liège 375 2009 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe Finland Helsinki 750 2011 COST - European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Europe France Belfort 300 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Cannes 440 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Chalon-sur-Saône 426 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Douai 400 2010 Viva 2010 - www.uncrd.or.jp and connectedcities.eu and lw2.easy-site.nl
Europe France La Rochelle
Europe France Maubeuge
Europe France Rouen 655.1 2016 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Caen 500 2010 ITDP (2007) Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide and CERTU 2010
Europe France Evry 580.6 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Le Mans 600 2016 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Lille 550.4 2017 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Lorient
Europe France Saint-Nazaire 474 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Toulouse 600 2010 Viva 2010 - www.uncrd.or.jp and CERTU 2010
Europe France Strasbourg 472 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Nîmes 460 2015 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Metz 484 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Lyon 571.5 2017 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Nantes 496.2 2022 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Nancy 370 2010 CERTU 2010
Europe France Paris 758 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe France Bayonne - Biarritz
Europe France Bayonne - Tarnos
Europe Germany Essen
Europe Germany Oberhausen 1133.3 2011 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe Netherlands Enschede 600 2011 COST - European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Europe Netherlands Amsterdam 1718.2 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe Netherlands Utrecht 680 2010 Viva 2010 - www.uncrd.or.jp and www.ashford.gov.uk and www.chinabrt.org
Europe Netherlands Almere
Europe Netherlands Eindhoven
Europe Spain Granada 381.8 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe Spain Castellón 416 2016 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe Sweden Stockholm 450 2011 COST - European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Europe Sweden Gothenburg 688 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe Sweden Jonkoping
Europe Switzerland Zurich 407 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe Turkey Istanbul 1181.8 2015 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe United Kingdom Cambridge 3,125 2015 Calculated using Busway system length and Busway stations
Europe United Kingdom Runcorn 507.9
Europe United Kingdom Kent
Europe United Kingdom Greater Manchester 425.6 2017 Calculated using corridor length and stations
Europe United Kingdom Fareham - Gosport 486 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Europe United Kingdom Luton
Europe United Kingdom Swansea
Asia Iran Tehran 772.7 2023 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia Iran Isfahan 531.3 2015 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia Iran Tabriz
Asia Taiwan Taipei 380 2007 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide (ITDP) 2007
Asia Taiwan Taichung 820 2014 easts.info
Asia Taiwan Chiayi 1,647 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia China Yinchuan 772.7 2013 www.chinabrt.org
Asia China Changde 787.5 2013
Asia China Hefei 855.6 2017
Asia China Lianyungang 1172.4 2013 www.chinabrt.org
Asia China Urumqi
Asia China Dalian 1245.5 2013 www.chinabrt.org
Asia China Guangzhou 880.8 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia China Jinan 1079.6 2017 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia China Zaozhuang 1,375 2013 www.chinabrt.org
Asia China Beijing 955.1 2013
Asia China Changzhou 875.4 2013
Asia China Chengdu 1028.6 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia China Hangzhou 1,103 2013
Asia China Lanzhou 606.7 2013 www.chinabrt.org
Asia China Xiamen 1,516 2013 Viva (www.chinabrt.org
Asia China Yancheng 666.7 2013 www.chinabrt.org
Asia China Yichang 590.9 2015 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia China Zhengzhou 802.6 2013 www.chinabrt.org
Asia China Chongqing 1,440 2011 www.chinabrt.org
Asia China Kunming
Asia India Indore 550 2013 EMBARQ India
Asia India Surat 555.6 2016 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia India Ahmedabad 645.7 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia India Bhopal 585.4 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia India Jaipur 710 2011 Primary Survey, EMBARQ
Asia India Pune - Primpi-Chinchwad 730 2016 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia India Hubballi-Dharwad 695.3 2020 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia India Amritsar 756.1 2019 amritsarportal.infinium.management
Asia India Rajkot 600 2013 EMBARQ India
Asia Indonesia Jakarta 971 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia Israel Haifa 519 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia Japan Nagoya 720 2007 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide (ITDP) 2007 and www.chinabrt.org
Asia Japan Kesennuma - Tome 1,276 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia Malaysia Subang Jaya 1,080 2015 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia Pakistan Lahore 1,080 2015 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia Pakistan Islamabad - Rawalpindi 1022.7 2015 Calculated using system length and stations
Asia Republic of Korea Seoul
Asia Thailand Bangkok 1,530 2011 Calculated using corridor length and stations
Asia Vietnam Hanoi 630.4 2017 Calculated using corridor length and stations
Northern America Canada Gatineau 1,200 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America Canada Ottawa 1549.7 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America Canada Mississauga 1,500 2017 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America Canada Quebec 637 2018 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America Canada Calgary
Northern America Canada York Regional Municipality 1,250 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America Canada Winnipeg 900 2012 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America United States Cleveland 292 2017 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America United States Eugene 787 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America United States Las Vegas 0.7 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America United States Miami 607.1 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America United States New York 805 2015 web.mta.info
Northern America United States San Bernardino 1606.3 2014 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America United States Alexandria - Arlington 785.7 2017 Calculated using corridor length and stations
Northern America United States Fort Collins 666.7 2016 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America United States Hartford County 1677.8 2016 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America United States Pittsburgh 1254.2 2016 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America United States Richmond 873.6 2018 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America United States Albuquerque 804.7 2020 www.cabq.gov
Northern America United States Orlando 300 2007 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide (ITDP) 2007
Northern America United States Los Angeles 1947.4 2019 Calculated using system length and stations
Northern America United States San Francisco
Africa Kenya Nairobi
Africa Nigeria Lagos 800 2015 Calculated using system length and stations
Africa South Africa Johannesburg 1,384 2013 Calculated using system length and stations
Africa South Africa Cape Town 1027.3 Calculated using system length and stations
Africa South Africa Pretoria 1166.7 2018 Calculated using system length and station
Africa Tanzania Dar es Salaam 600 2018 DAR RAPID TRANSIT AGENCY