Global BRTData

    ABOUT
  BRT
DATA

About Global BRTData

The BRTData is a Project of Across Latitudes and Cultures – Bus Rapid Transit (ALC-BRT), a Centre of Excellence for Bus Rapid Transit. The platform construction and data collect are the result of a partnership between the ALC-BRT members, the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Latin American Association of Integrated Transport Systems and BRT (SIBRT). Currently, the BRTData is managed and updated by WRI Brasil Sustainable Cities.

    FIND
  YOUR
SYSTEM

BY CITY

    FIND
  YOUR
INDICATOR

SYSTEM

Report

Teresina, Brazil

 

Teresina has 844,245 inhabitants. 24,4% of total trips are made by public transport, as showed in the graph below.

 

MODAL SPLIT - TERESINA

 

SYSTEM LENGTH IN RELATION TO Brazil

 

Some technical details about corridors are presented in the table below.

 

 

Corridor NameDaily demand, corridor (passengers per day)Corridor length (km)Stations, corridorPre-board fare collection, corridorOvertaking lanes, corridorStation boarding level, corridorOperating speed, corridor
Av. Frei Serafim 1,50 2 Partial On-street, no level boarding

Curiosities

SYSTEM Indicators

Indicator Value Date Source
GDP per capita (US$) (General info) 8,539 2015 databank.worldbank.org
Population, city (General info) 844,245 2015 ftp.ibge.gov.br
Population, metro area (General info) 1,189,260 2014 pt.wikipedia.org
Population density, metropolitan area (General info) 113,0 2014 pt.wikipedia.org
Modal split % public transport (General info) 24,4 2008 www.teresina.pi.gov.br
Modal split % private transport (General info) 31,2 2008 www.teresina.pi.gov.br
Modal split % non motorized (General info) 44,4 2008 www.teresina.pi.gov.br
System name (System info)
Corridors (System info) 1 2011
Year system commenced (System info) 2011
Transit agency (System info) Superintendencia de Transportes e Trânsito (Strans)
Standard fare (US$) (System info) 1,01 2017 g1.globo.com
Annual fare revenue (US$ millions) (System info)
Fare integration within the system (System info) Yes 2011 blogpontodeonibus.wordpress.com
Citywide fare integration (other modes) (System info)
Integration terminals (System info)
Transfer stations (System info)
Peak load (passengers per hour per direction) (System info)
Daily demand (passengers per day) (System info)
Annual demand (passengers per year) (System info)
Capital productivity (boardings per bus per day) (System info)
Operational productivity (IPK) (System info)
Operations control center (System info)
Trunk lines (System info)
Feeder routes (System info)
Depots (System info)
System length (km) (Additional Information) 1,50 Google Maps
Position of with-flow lanes (Additional Information) Curbside Google Maps
Position of counterflow lanes (Additional Information) N/A Google Maps
Position of bus doors (Additional Information) Right
Lane material on running ways (Additional Information) Asphalt Google Maps
Lane material at stations (Additional Information) Asphalt Google Maps
Stations (Additional Information) 2 2012, in one direction there are only 2 stations and in the oposite there are 6 stations Google Maps
Station spacing (m) (Additional Information) 750,0 Calculated using system length and stations
Pre-board fare collection (Additional Information)
Overtaking lanes (Additional Information) Partial Google Maps
Station boarding level (Additional Information) On-street, no level boarding Google Maps
Real time information (Additional Information)
Peak frequency (buses per hour) (Additional Information)
Operating speed (Additional Information)
Total fleet (System fleet)
Fleet, standard buses (System fleet)
Average age, standard buses (System fleet)
Propulsion, standard buses (System fleet)
Fuel type, standard buses (System fleet)
Fuel economy, standard buses (System fleet)
Fleet, articulated buses (System fleet)
Average age, articulated buses (System fleet)
Propulsion, articulated buses (System fleet)
Fuel type, articulated buses (System fleet)
Fuel economy, articulated buses (System fleet)
Fleet, bi-articulated buses (System fleet)
Average age, bi-articulated buses (System fleet)
Propulsion, bi-articulated buses (System fleet)
Fuel type, bi-articulated buses (System fleet)
Fuel economy, bi-articulated buses (System fleet)
Fleet, double-decker buses (System fleet)
Average age, double-decker buses (System fleet)
Propulsion, double-decker buses (System fleet)
Fuel type, double-decker buses (System fleet)
Fuel economy, double-decker buses (System fleet)
Typical fuel type (System fleet)
City's diesel sulfur content (ppm) (System fleet)
Total cost per kilometer (US$ million per km) (System cost)
Planning cost (US$ million) (System cost)
Capital cost per kilometer (US$ million per km) (System cost)
Infrastructure cost per kilometer (US$ million per km) (System cost)
Equipment cost (US$ million) (System cost)
Annual operational cost (US$ million) (System cost)
User rating (System image) Average 2011, Northeast region www.ipea.gov.br
Brand and logo (System image)
Unique bus livery (System image)
Citywide annual road fatalities (System road safety) 468 2013 DATASUS
Citywide annual injuries (System road safety)

CORRIDOR Indicators - Av. Frei Serafim

Indicator Value Date Source
Corridor Name (Corridor info) Av. Frei Serafim
Year corridor commenced (Corridor info) 2011
Corridor service (Corridor info) Conventional bus services
Peak load, corridor (passengers per hour per direction) (Corridor info)
Daily demand, corridor (passengers per day) (Corridor info)
Trunk lines, corridor (Corridor info)
Corridor length (km) (Running ways) 1,50 Google Maps
Length of segregated lanes, corridor (km) (Running ways) 1,50 Google Maps
Length of segregated counterflow lanes, corridor (km) (Running ways) 0,00
Length of exclusive lanes, corridor (km) (Running ways) 0,00
Mixed traffic with-flow length, corridor (km) (Running ways)
Position of with-flow lanes, corridor (Running ways) Curbside Google Maps
Position of counterflow lanes, corridor (Running ways) N/A
Position of bus doors, corridor (Running ways) Right
Lane material on running ways, corridor (Running ways) Asphalt Google Maps
Lane material at stations, corridor (Running ways) Asphalt Google Maps
Grade-separated intersections, corridor (Traffic engineering) None Google Maps
Fixed signal priority (Traffic engineering)
Dynamic signal priority (Traffic engineering)
Stations, corridor (Stations) 2 2012, in one direction there are only 2 stations and in the oposite there are 6 stations Google Maps
Station spacing, corridor (m) (Stations) 750,0 Calculated using corridor length and stations
Enhanced stations (Stations) No Google Maps
Pre-board fare collection, corridor (Stations)
Overtaking lanes, corridor (Stations) Partial Google Maps
Station boarding level, corridor (Stations) On-street, no level boarding Google Maps
Type of bus guidance (ITS) None Google Maps
Peak frequency, corridor (buses per hour per direction) (Travel time)
Operating speed, corridor (Travel time)
Express services (Travel time)
Speed limit (km/h) (Travel time)
Real time information, corridor (Comfort)
Physically integrated feeders (Comfort)
Total cost per kilometer, corridor (US$ million per km) (Cost)
Planning cost, corridor (US$ million) (Cost)
Infrastructure cost per kilometer, corridor (US$ million per km) (Cost)
User rating, corridor (Quality of service) Average 2011, Northeast region www.ipea.gov.br
Corridor annual fatalities (Road Safety)

Please, answer the questions below to start your download.

1

2

3

Thank you for answer.

Please, read the information below to start your download.

Thank you for filling out the questions.

If you prefer, you can download a full version of BRT DATA with worldwide data.
Download it here in Excel or CSV.

After you click the download button, your download will start automatically when the conversion process (it can take up to 30 seconds) is complete.